预应变速率对QP1180钢微观组织和力学性能的影响

徐飞越, 李兵, 张鹏, 陈文轩, 张红霞, 邢俊峰

精密成形工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (8) : 107-114.

PDF(9975 KB)
PDF(9975 KB)
精密成形工程 ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (8) : 107-114. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6457.2025.08.012
钢铁成形

预应变速率对QP1180钢微观组织和力学性能的影响

  • 徐飞越1, 李兵1,*, 张鹏1, 陈文轩1, 张红霞1, 邢俊峰2
作者信息 +

Effect of Pre-strain Rate on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of QP1180 Steel

  • XU Feiyue1, LI Bing1,*, ZHANG Peng1, CHEN Wenxuan1, ZHANG Hongxia1, XING Junfeng2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 研究不同预应变速率对QP1180钢的影响,探究适宜的预应变速率,分析不同预应变速率下的微观组织演变与力学响应,从而优化QP1180高强钢的综合性能。方法 首先通过QP1180钢进行不同速率的预应变处理,随后采用光学显微镜、扫描电镜、XRD测试和拉伸试验及硬度测试等方法系统研究QP1180钢的变化规律和力学性能。结果 不同预应变速率下的微观组织类型没有明显变化,随着预应变速率的增加,残余奥氏体含量下降,马氏体含量增加。当预应变速率为10-1 s-1时,试样硬度值达到最高为398.7HV。随着预应变速率由10-4 s-1增加至10-1 s-1,QP1180钢的屈服强度逐渐增加,由1 157.2 MPa增大至1 297.6 MPa,伸长率由15.8%下降到13.2%,而抗拉强度并没有明显差异,用强塑积的大小来反映材料综合性能的好坏,在低预应变速率10-4 s-1下,强塑积最高为21.3 GPa·%,综合性能最优。试样的拉伸断口断裂方式均属于韧性断裂,且都存有明显的韧窝状花样。结论 系统分析了不同预应变速率下QP1180钢的组织演变规律和力学性能,得出材料在预应变量为4%、速率为10-4 s-1条件下,综合性能最好,研究结果对QP1180钢的安全服役具有一定的指导意义。

Abstract

The work aims to investigate the effects of different pre-strain rates on QP1180 steel, determine the optimal pre-strain rate, analyze the microstructural evolution and mechanical response under different pre-strain rates, and thereby optimize the comprehensive properties of QP1180 high-strength steel. First, QP1180 steel was subject to pre-strain treatment at different rates. Subsequently, optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, XRD testing, tensile testing, and hardness testing were employed to systematically investigate the changes in QP1180 steel and its mechanical properties. The microstructural types did not show significant changes under different pre-strain rates. As the rate increased, the residual austenite content decreased, while the martensite content increased. When the pre-strain rate was 10-1 s-1, the hardness value of the specimen reached a maximum of 398.7 HV. As the pre-strain rate increased from 10-4 s-1 to 10-1 s-1, the yield strength of QP1180 steel gradually increased from 1 157.2 MPa to 1 297.6 MPa, while the elongation decreased from 15.8% to 13.2%. However, there was no significant difference in tensile strength. The strength-plasticity product, which reflected the overall performance of the material, reached its highest value of 21.3 GPa·% at the low pre-strain rate of 10-4 s-1, indicating the best overall performance. The fracture mode of the tensile specimens was ductile fracture, and all exhibited distinct ductile dimple patterns. In conclusion, according to the systematic analysis of the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of QP1180 steel under different pre-strain rates, it was concluded that the material exhibits the best overall performance under a pre-strain of 4% and a strain rate of 10-4 s-1, providing valuable guidance for the safe service life of QP1180 steel.

关键词

QP1180钢 / 预应变速率 / 微观组织 / 力学性能 / 残余奥氏体

Key words

QP1180 steel / pre-strain rate / microstructure / mechanical properties / retained austenite

引用本文

导出引用
徐飞越, 李兵, 张鹏, 陈文轩, 张红霞, 邢俊峰. 预应变速率对QP1180钢微观组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 精密成形工程. 2025, 17(8): 107-114 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-6457.2025.08.012
XU Feiyue, LI Bing, ZHANG Peng, CHEN Wenxuan, ZHANG Hongxia, XING Junfeng. Effect of Pre-strain Rate on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of QP1180 Steel[J]. Journal of Netshape Forming Engineering. 2025, 17(8): 107-114 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-6457.2025.08.012
中图分类号: TG142.1   

参考文献

[1] 雷先华, 文涛, 鲁仕豪, 等. 汽车轻量化研究现状及发展趋势探讨[J]. 汽车工艺师, 2024(6): 6-8.
LEI X H, WEN T, LU S H, et al.Research Status and Development Trend of Automobile Lightweight[J]. Auto Manufacturing Engineer, 2024(6): 6-8.
[2] 刘清梅, 封娇洁. 汽车轻量化条件下先进高强钢的发展及现状[J]. 轧钢, 2020, 37(4): 65-70.
LIU Q M, FENG J J.Development and Current Situation of Advanced High-Strength Steel under the Condition of Automobile Light Weight[J]. Steel Rolling, 2020, 37(4): 65-70.
[3] 程瑄, 桂晓露, 高古辉. 先进高强钢中的残余奥氏体: 综述[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(7): 120-131.
CHENG X, GUI X L, GAO G H.Retained Austenite in Advanced High Strength Steels: A Review[J]. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(7): 120-131.
[4] BHATTACHARYA D, CHO L, COLBURN J, et al.Silicon Effect on Retardation of Fe-Zn Alloying Behavior: Towards an Explanation of Liquid Zinc Embrittlement Susceptibility of Third Generation Advanced High Strength Steels[J]. Corrosion Science, 2024, 235: 112161.
[5] PEREIRA R, PEIXINHO N, COSTA S L.A Review of Sheet Metal Forming Evaluation of Advanced High- Strength Steels (AHSS)[J]. Metals, 2024, 14(4): 394.
[6] 巢成新, 于强, 李秋. 汽车用先进高强钢本构模型与韧性断裂模型研究进展[J]. 精密成形工程, 2024, 16(1): 77-86.
CHAO C X, YU Q, LI Q.Research Progress on Constitutive Model and Ductile Fracture Model of Advanced High Strength Steel for Automotive Applications[J]. Journal of Netshape Forming Engineering, 2024, 16(1): 77-86.
[7] 唐远寿, 司宇, 徐正萌, 等. 超高强度钢在汽车轻量化中的应用及研究进展[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(10): 247-254.
TANG Y S, SI Y, XU Z M, et al.Application and Research Progress of Ultra-High Strength Steel in Automotive Lightweight[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2023, 48(10): 247-254.
[8] BAI S B, CHEN Y A, SHENG J, et al.A Comprehensive Overview of High Strength and Toughness Steels for Automobile Based on QP Process[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2023, 27: 2216-2236.
[9] WANG S W, CHEN M X, YANG M Y, et al.Effect of Cold Rolling Reduction Rate on the Microstructure and Properties of Q&P Steel with a Ferrite-Pearlite Initial Structure[J]. Materials, 2023, 16(18): 6102.
[10] 赵秋红, 王庆芬, 马到原. 轧制预变形和奥氏体化温度对贝氏体钢显微组织与拉伸性能的影响[J]. 机械工程材料, 2023, 47(7): 62-66.
ZHAO Q H, WANG Q F, MA D Y.Effect of Rolling Pre-Deformation and Austenitizing Temperature on Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Bainitic Steel[J]. Materials for Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 47(7): 62-66.
[11] 孔玉强, 李伟, 段朋. 预应变对高强度低合金钢性能和组织的影响[J]. 锻压技术, 2024, 49(4): 219-225.
KONG Y Q, LI W, DUAN P.Influence of Pre-Strain on Properties and Microstructure for High Strength Low Alloy Steel[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2024, 49(4): 219-225.
[12] 郝硕, 李志国, 张鑫, 等. 预应变对TRIP型双相不锈钢拉伸变形行为的影响[J]. 钢铁, 2022, 57(4): 105-113.
HAO S, LI Z G, ZHANG X, et al.Influence of Pre-Strain on Tensile Deformation Behavior of TRIP- Assisted Duplex Stainless Steel[J]. Iron and Steel, 2022, 57(4): 105-113.
[13] ZHANG L, WANG C Y, LU H C, et al.Austenite Transformation and Work Hardening of Medium Manganese Steel[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 2018, 25(12): 1265-1269.
[14] 胡汉江, 赵爱民, 印珠凯, 等. 预应变对TRIP钢力学性能及硬化行为的影响[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2016, 37(5): 128-132.
HU H J, ZHAO A M, YIN Z K, et al.Effect of Pre-Strain on Mechanical Properties and Hardening Behavior of TRIP Steel[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2016, 37(5): 128-132.
[15] 张鹏, 李兵, 徐飞越, 等. 预变形对Q&P钢微观组织及烘烤硬化性能的影响[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2024, 45(6): 101-110.
ZHANG P, LI B, XU F Y, et al.Effect of Pre-Strain on Microstructure and Bake Hardening Properties of Q & P Steel[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2024, 45(6): 101-110.
[16] 吴聪, 景财年, 林涛, 等. 应变速率对热冲压淬火-配分钢显微组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 材料工程, 2022, 50(10): 73-79.
WU C, JING C N, LIN T, et al.Effect of Strain Rate on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Hot Stamping Quenching-Partitioning Steel[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2022, 50(10): 73-79.
[17] 黄明欣, 王铭. 基于Hopkinson拉杆技术的QP980钢动态力学性能研究[J]. 鞍钢技术, 2019(4): 1-4.
HUANG M X, WANG M.Study on Dynamic Mechanical Properties of QP980 Steel Based on Test Technology by Hopkinson Tensile Bar[J]. Angang Technology, 2019(4): 1-4.
[18] LI C L, XIAO L, LI L, et al.Effect of Bainite/Martensite/Retained Austenite Triplex Microstructure on the High Strain Rate Behavior of a One Step Quenching and Partitioning Steel[J]. Materials Science Forum, 2022, 1072: 45-54.
[19] XIE Z J, REN Y Q, ZHOU W H, et al.Stability of Retained Austenite in Multi-Phase Microstructure during Austempering and Its Effect on the Ductility of a Low Carbon Steel[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2014, 603: 69-75.
[20] FU B, YANG W Y, WANG Y D, et al.Micromechanical Behavior of TRIP-Assisted Multiphase Steels Studied with in Situ High-Energy X-Ray Diffraction[J]. Acta Materialia, 2014, 76: 342-354.
[21] TJAHJANTO D D, SUIKER A S J, TURTELTAUB S, et al. Micromechanical Predictions of TRIP Steel Behavior as a Function of Microstructural Parameters[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2007, 41(1): 107-116.
[22] ZHOU Q, QIAN L H, TAN J, et al.Inconsistent Effects of Mechanical Stability of Retained Austenite on Ductility and Toughness of Transformation-Induced Plasticity Steels[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2013, 578: 370-376.
[23] LIU C H, HU C, WANG X G, et al.A New Perspective on Lüders Band Formation in Medium-Mn Steels Based on Lüders-Strain-Rate and Dislocation Evolution[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2024, 901: 146553.
[24] OLSON G B, COHEN M.A Mechanism for the Strain- Induced Nucleation of Martensitic Transformations[J]. Journal of the Less Common Metals, 1972, 28(1): 107-118.
[25] HE B B, WANG M, HUANG M X.Resetting the Austenite Stability in a Medium Mn Steel via Dislocation Engineering[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2019, 50(6): 2971-2977.
[26] RANJAN R, BELADI H, HODGSON P D, et al.Yield Point Phenomenon in Low-Alloyed TRIP-Aided Steel: Role of Retained Austenite[J]. Materials Science and Technology, 2023, 39(1): 85-93.
[27] 邝春福. 预应变与烘烤温度对低碳钢和双相钢组织性能的影响[J]. 钢铁钒钛, 2020, 41(4): 150-156.
KUANG C F.Effects of Pre-Strain and Baking Temperature on the Microstructure and Bake-Hardening Behavior of Mild Steel and Dual Phase Steel[J]. Iron Steel Vanadium Titanium, 2020, 41(4): 150-156.

基金

湖北省重点研发项目(2021BAB019); 湖北省科技重大专项(2022AAA001)

PDF(9975 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/