文章摘要
冯新,马英杰,李建崇,等.铸造、锻造和粉末冶金TC4钛合金损伤容限行为对比研究[J].精密成形工程,2018,10(3):46-54.
FENG Xin,MA Ying-jie,LI Jian-chong,et al.Comparative Study on Damage Tolerance Properties of TC4 Titanium Alloy Manufactured by Casting, Forging and Powder Metallurgy[J].Journal of Netshape Forming Engineering,2018,10(3):46-54.
铸造、锻造和粉末冶金TC4钛合金损伤容限行为对比研究
Comparative Study on Damage Tolerance Properties of TC4 Titanium Alloy Manufactured by Casting, Forging and Powder Metallurgy
投稿时间:2018-04-08  修订日期:2018-05-10
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-6457.2018.03.009
中文关键词: 钛合金  断裂韧性  疲劳裂纹扩展  塑性区  网格法
英文关键词: titanium alloy  fracture toughness  fatigue crack growth  plastic zone  grid method
基金项目:欧盟“地平线2020”研究与创新项目(690725);工信部民用飞机专项科研(MJ-2015-H-G-104)
作者单位
冯新 1. 中国航发北京航空材料研究院北京 1000952. 北京市先进钛合金精密成型工程技术研究中心北京100095 
马英杰 中国科学院金属研究所沈阳 110016 
李建崇 1. 中国航发北京航空材料研究院北京 1000952. 北京市先进钛合金精密成型工程技术研究中心北京100095 
丁贤飞 1. 中国航发北京航空材料研究院北京 1000952. 北京市先进钛合金精密成型工程技术研究中心北京100095 
南海 1. 中国航发北京航空材料研究院北京 1000952. 北京市先进钛合金精密成型工程技术研究中心北京100095 
崔玉友 中国科学院金属研究所沈阳 110016 
雷家峰 中国科学院金属研究所沈阳 110016 
摘要点击次数: 3808
全文下载次数: 3398
中文摘要:
      目的 研究影响铸造、锻造和粉末冶金TC4钛合金的损伤容限行为差异的主要因素。方法 分别从裂纹尖端塑性变形行为、二次裂纹及断口表面粗糙度3个方面对比,分析造成3种成形方法制备的TC4钛合金的断裂韧性和疲劳裂纹扩展速率差异的原因。结果 铸造TC4钛合金断裂韧性优于锻造和粉末冶金TC4钛合金,主要是因为新产生的裂纹面积大,消耗更多断裂能量。铸造TC4钛合金疲劳裂纹扩展速率低于锻造、粉末冶金TC4钛合金,其主要原因为曲折的裂纹路径和断面粗糙度诱发裂纹闭合效应以及长而深的二次裂纹。结论 3种成形方法制备TC4钛合金损伤容限行为差异的主要原因是断裂形成了不同裂纹路径形貌。
英文摘要:
      The paper aims to study main factors influencing discrepancy of damage tolerance behaviors of as-cast, as-forged and powder metallurgy TC4 titanium alloy. A comparative analysis of the main reasons for differences of the fracture toughness and fatigue crack propagation growth rates of TC4 titanium alloy manufactured by three forming methods was made from three aspects: plastic deformation behavior at crack tip, secondary cracks and fracture surface toughness. Results indicate that fracture toughness property of as-cast TC4 alloy was better than that of as-forged and powder metallurgy TC4 titanium alloys, which was mainly because that the area of newly generated fracture surface was larger, and more fracture energy was consumed. The fatigue crack growth rate of as-cast TC4 titanium alloy was lower than that of as-forged and powder metallurgy TC4 titanium alloy; and the main reason was that the crack closure effect induced by zigzag crack path and fracture surface roughness along with long and deep secondary cracks. The discrepancy of damage tolerance behavior of TC4 titanium alloy made by three forming methods is due to different crack path profiles formed by rupture.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

关于我们 | 联系我们 | 投诉建议 | 隐私保护 | 用户协议

您是第12294528位访问者    渝ICP备15012534号-6

>版权所有:《精密成形工程》编辑部 2014 All Rights Reserved

>邮编:400039 电话:023-68679125传真:02368792396 Email: jmcxgc@163.com

>    

渝公网安备 50010702501719号